ᐅ Floor plan design shortly before submitting the building permit application

Created on: 2 Oct 2017 23:25
R
R.Hotzenplotz
Hello everyone!

As some users have requested before, I’m now starting a new thread with the current planning of our detached house, which is about to be finalized.

These are the preliminary drawings for the building permit / planning permission application, and I have one last chance to review them and point out any issues.

It still seems to me that there is less than 1.20m (4 feet) of space between the two wardrobes in the dressing room. Or am I seeing this wrong? Apparently, the rooms on the left and right were overlooked and not adjusted accordingly.

Two Velux ceiling spotlights are still planned to illuminate the upper floor hallway.

In the basement, on the right side in the upper room, a window similar to the one on the left basement side is an option.

We still haven’t decided on the T30 fire-rated door to the garage, even though it is shown in the plans. Most likely, for safety reasons and the limited use of the kitchen at the other end of the house, we will eventually forgo it.

User 11ant pointed out that the right window in child’s room 2 is suboptimally positioned. However, this could still be changed after submitting the building permit / planning permission application. Our architect thinks moving the window to the left would negatively affect the house’s exterior appearance. We’ll have to see about that.

Grundriss Kellergeschoss mit 3 Kellerräumen, Abstellraum, Flur, Haustechnik und Treppe.


Grundriss eines Hauses mit Keller, Flur KG, Haustechnik KG, Abstellraum KG und Treppen


Grundriss eines Hauses: Garage, Büro, Garderobe, Diele, WC, Küche, Wohn-/Essbereich.


Grundriss Dachgeschoss: Schlafzimmer, Ankleide, Bad, Dusche, zwei Kinderzimmer, Flur HWR Dachterrasse


Technischer Grundriss: Zentraler, ungenutzter DG-Bereich (193 m²) mit umlaufenden Dachschrägen.


Schnitt durch mehrstöckiges Wohnhaus mit Keller, Treppe, Dachkonstruktion und Maßlinien.


Moderne Wohnhausansicht: zweigeschossiges Gebäude mit Garage links und großen Fenstern.


Architektonischer Haus-Elevationsplan: Keller bis Dachgeschoss, Dach, Fenster, Geländeprofil.


Moderne zweigeschossige Hausansicht mit Flachdach, Balkonen, großen Fenstern und Garage.


Zweistöckiges Haus mit dunkler Fassade, grauem Dach, Balkon rechts und Garten mit Bäumen.
A
Alex85
31 Dec 2017 17:57
I consider the savings to be greatly exaggerated. Besides the brick, it also saves on the facade (plaster, paint, possibly external thermal insulation composite system), as well as interior plaster, paint, and wall coverings.
5,000 euros would already be considerable.
Maybe a bit more if the windows are also made smaller.
M
matte
31 Dec 2017 18:44
A bit more clearly:

How are you supposed to save 600 €/m³ when the average construction costs are around 350 - 400 €/m³?

There must be something seriously wrong here.
A
Alex85
31 Dec 2017 18:47
I also find it strange to still be working with formulas at this stage of planning. Fingers crossed.
R
R.Hotzenplotz
31 Dec 2017 18:58
Alex85 schrieb:
I also find it strange to still be working with formulas at this stage of planning. Fingers crossed.

That might not reflect well on the construction consultant.
11ant1 Jan 2018 02:17
R.Hotzenplotz schrieb:
The building consultant also got in touch regarding the expected reduction in construction costs. He estimates about €600 / m³ (around $650 / yd³). With approximately 41 m³ (54 yd³), that’s not bad.

I consider the “allocation” of saved cubic meters to the price per cubic meter of the remaining volume to be a meaningless philosophical calculation—aside from the minor detail that a decimal point may have been misplaced.

Based on the absolute numbers you mentioned, about 2.75% of the cubic meters will be eliminated. If these were average in cost, the savings would correspond to exactly those 2.75%. However, that’s not the case here, since only wall height meters are being removed—not ceilings, roof structures, piping, etc. So these are proportionally relatively low-value cubic meters.

I’d say, “Sailor, stop dreaming,” and assume a reduction of around 1.6 to 1.7% of the construction costs as the realistic impact.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
R
R.Hotzenplotz
1 Jan 2018 08:26
That doesn't speak in favor of hiring the building consultant for construction supervision.