Hello, today I had to wait for an hour and only had my notebook with me... so I just doodled a bit.
This is my very first draft of the ground floor, and it probably still has quite a few mistakes.
What I’m curious about is whether there are any major errors here (for example, the staircase?).
North is at the bottom right.
One square represents half a meter (0.5 m / 20 inches).
This is my very first draft of the ground floor, and it probably still has quite a few mistakes.
What I’m curious about is whether there are any major errors here (for example, the staircase?).
North is at the bottom right.
One square represents half a meter (0.5 m / 20 inches).
Dimensions are quite useful—actually valuable information. However, they should not interfere with the visual representation; therefore, I find programs that add dimension lines more suitable. And the measurements should be accurate. For example, just because you don’t click the mouse with sub-millimeter precision, you shouldn’t conclude a room width of 406 cm (160 inches) for one child’s room and 410 cm (161 inches) for another. And having the chimney exactly 53 centimeters (21 inches) wide is also odd. It would be better if, in sketch mode, the program always rounded measurements, and if grid lines could be set to “snap” every 10 cm (4 inches), for example. Such pseudo-precise figures are confusing—having numbers visible at all, however, is helpful.
If the exterior dimensions are 10.3 by 10.6 meters (34 by 35 feet), meaning a 0.3 meter (1 foot) difference equals the ridge length, this looks, in my opinion, rather “unintended.” I consider a ridge length of less than three rafter spacings—about 2.5 meters (8 feet)—to be awkward. When working with trusses, it also makes sense to think in rafter spacings.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
If the exterior dimensions are 10.3 by 10.6 meters (34 by 35 feet), meaning a 0.3 meter (1 foot) difference equals the ridge length, this looks, in my opinion, rather “unintended.” I consider a ridge length of less than three rafter spacings—about 2.5 meters (8 feet)—to be awkward. When working with trusses, it also makes sense to think in rafter spacings.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
MIA_SAN_MIA__ schrieb:
Servus, ich bin halt ein digitaler Mensch...]You wouldn’t even notice [emoji23]
Just a side note: the bigger your plans are, meaning the more ballrooms you use, the less a floor plan feels cramped.
M
MIA_SAN_MIA__26 Sep 2017 20:06ypg schrieb:
You don’t notice it at all [emoji23]
Just a note: the bigger you plan, meaning the more ballrooms you include, the less cramped the floor plan feels.I’m also responsible for digitalization and so on at work...Sure, I could make it bigger, but it has to stay within reasonable limits. About 180m2 (1937 sq ft) with basement and around 200m2 (2153 sq ft) if absolutely necessary.
@11ant
Many new builds have these small ridge beams. We think they look better than a tent roof.
What do you think of the design? It’s really about time for the surveyor to come so I can finally meet with the architect...
MIA_SAN_MIA__ schrieb:
I’m also responsible for digitalization and so on at work...
Of course, I could make it bigger, but it should stay within reasonable limits. About 180m2 (1940 sq ft) with a basement and around 200m2 (2150 sq ft) if it really has to be without one.
@11ant
Many new builds have these small dormers. We think they look better than a hip roof.
What do you think about the design? It’s really time for the inspector to come so I can finally meet with the planner...You misunderstood me.
You’ve already drawn ballrooms that surely aren’t affordable for you either. With an estimated 25m2 (270 sq ft) for the entrance hall, you’re setting the bar high. That’s why it looks feasible to you.
M
MIA_SAN_MIA__26 Sep 2017 21:56Why should a 180m2 (1,937 sq ft) house be unaffordable for me? Sorry, but that doesn’t make sense.
MIA_SAN_MIA__ schrieb:
Why shouldn’t a 180m2 (1,938 sq ft) house be affordable for me? Sorry, but that’s nonsense.You can definitely afford a 200m2 (2,153 sq ft) house too!
But what you’ve drawn on that digital plan is not proportional to your desired dimensions. It’s all an illusion if you think a slightly wider child’s bed will fit in the bedroom and that means it works. Your doors are only about 79cm/75cm (31 inches/29.5 inches) wide, and so on.
Your hallway on the ground floor measures roughly 5.4 x 5.5 meters (18 x 18 feet), about 29m2 (312 sq ft), minus the two closets at the entrance... You could dance in the bathroom... A digital-savvy person should be able to see that it’s not going to work out as it seems.
Great idea, but I’m out!