ᐅ Floor plan for a 150 sqm single-family house with the living room facing north
Created on: 13 Sep 2017 21:19
H
Herr Stein
Hello everyone,
We are currently considering a plot of land and have been thinking in more detail about the floor plan. I have created several versions, all differing in small details. I have uploaded the latest version of our ideas and an attempt to fit the floor plan into a slightly smaller footprint. Unfortunately, when reducing the size of the upper floor, the only idea I have is to recess the doors slightly, which creates small "bumps" in the rooms. Perhaps there are other suggestions for this.
Since it’s hard to see: The staircase in the regular version is quarter-turn and leads north on the upper floor. The staircase in the smaller version is half-turn and leads east.
Zoning/building restrictions: no zoning plan, i.e., according to neighboring buildings
Plot size: 800sqm (8,611 sq ft)
Slope: no
Site coverage ratio: no specification
Floor area ratio: no specification
Number of floors: 1.5
Roof type: gable roof
Orientation: living room faces north
Owners’ requirements
Basement: no basement
Number of people, ages: two adults, two preschool children
Space requirements on ground floor and upper floor: as shown in the floor plan
Office: home office
Guest nights per year: 30 nights annually
Open or closed architecture: rather closed
Conservative or modern construction: rather conservative
Open kitchen or kitchen island: no
Number of dining seats: 4 in kitchen, 6-8 in living room
Fireplace: no
Music/stereo wall: no
Balcony, roof terrace: no
Garage, carport: not yet considered
Vegetable garden, greenhouse: no
Other wishes/particulars/daily routine, also reasons for preferences or exclusions: Living room facing north is preferred because we want access to the terrace without direct sunlight. South-facing study is fine as it is used during the day.
House design
Source of planning: own design, a mix of many floor plans from catalogs
What do you especially like? Why?: Space in the living room for family celebrations (joining two tables...), kitchen and living room connected to the terrace
What don’t you like? Why?: The house might be a bit too large for the budget – is it possible to reduce the size without major compromises?
Personal budget for the house, including fittings: 300,000 EUR
Preferred heating system: gas plus the minimum requirements to meet the 2017 energy saving regulations
If you had to give up some details/features, which ones could you do without?
- We could integrate the guest room upstairs into the study if necessary.
What is the most important/basic question about the floor plan in 130 characters?
Could the floor plan be reduced in size without significant compromises?
P.S.: The bathroom fixtures are only roughly placed for now, just so they are recognizable as bathrooms. Planning is not yet finalized.
We are currently considering a plot of land and have been thinking in more detail about the floor plan. I have created several versions, all differing in small details. I have uploaded the latest version of our ideas and an attempt to fit the floor plan into a slightly smaller footprint. Unfortunately, when reducing the size of the upper floor, the only idea I have is to recess the doors slightly, which creates small "bumps" in the rooms. Perhaps there are other suggestions for this.
Since it’s hard to see: The staircase in the regular version is quarter-turn and leads north on the upper floor. The staircase in the smaller version is half-turn and leads east.
Zoning/building restrictions: no zoning plan, i.e., according to neighboring buildings
Plot size: 800sqm (8,611 sq ft)
Slope: no
Site coverage ratio: no specification
Floor area ratio: no specification
Number of floors: 1.5
Roof type: gable roof
Orientation: living room faces north
Owners’ requirements
Basement: no basement
Number of people, ages: two adults, two preschool children
Space requirements on ground floor and upper floor: as shown in the floor plan
Office: home office
Guest nights per year: 30 nights annually
Open or closed architecture: rather closed
Conservative or modern construction: rather conservative
Open kitchen or kitchen island: no
Number of dining seats: 4 in kitchen, 6-8 in living room
Fireplace: no
Music/stereo wall: no
Balcony, roof terrace: no
Garage, carport: not yet considered
Vegetable garden, greenhouse: no
Other wishes/particulars/daily routine, also reasons for preferences or exclusions: Living room facing north is preferred because we want access to the terrace without direct sunlight. South-facing study is fine as it is used during the day.
House design
Source of planning: own design, a mix of many floor plans from catalogs
What do you especially like? Why?: Space in the living room for family celebrations (joining two tables...), kitchen and living room connected to the terrace
What don’t you like? Why?: The house might be a bit too large for the budget – is it possible to reduce the size without major compromises?
Personal budget for the house, including fittings: 300,000 EUR
Preferred heating system: gas plus the minimum requirements to meet the 2017 energy saving regulations
If you had to give up some details/features, which ones could you do without?
- We could integrate the guest room upstairs into the study if necessary.
What is the most important/basic question about the floor plan in 130 characters?
Could the floor plan be reduced in size without significant compromises?
P.S.: The bathroom fixtures are only roughly placed for now, just so they are recognizable as bathrooms. Planning is not yet finalized.
I don't see enough space in the living room for family gatherings. It will be quite cramped at the dining table, especially since a desk is drawn in on the right side. Please upload a plan of the property here, so the position of the windows and the living room can be better assessed. As it is now, it will be very dark, meaning you'll probably need lighting in the living room during the day in winter.
Best regards,
Sabine
Best regards,
Sabine
kaho674 schrieb:
Terrace doors open inwards They don’t have to. However, if you choose the traditional inward opening, then I agree that they should be drawn to open inwards.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
11ant schrieb:
That’s not necessary. However, if the doors open inward in the traditional way, I agree, then they should also be drawn opening inward. Oh really? Some open outward too? Haha, learned something new.
kaho674 schrieb:
Do some also open outwards? In Egypt, always, as I've been told. I believe the same applies in Sweden. It used to be common practice. Regular patio doors opening inwards only became standard when lift-and-slide balcony doors were introduced – it would likely have been too complicated to design the lever position inside while having the door open outwards.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
Similar topics