Hello everyone,
I already posted a floor plan in the building costs forum.
There was a comment that the children's rooms are too small.
Yesterday, I visited a show home for a quote and took a look at the rooms there.
I have to admit, I was a bit shocked by the size of the children's rooms, which were about 11 sqm (118 sq ft). So, hardly smaller than what we have planned. Itâs hard to imagine the room size just from the paper.
Do you have any ideas on how to enlarge the three children's rooms on the upper floor without completely changing the entire floor plan?
Or if you have any other criticism or suggestions for improvement, feel free to share.
Best regards,
Steffen






I already posted a floor plan in the building costs forum.
There was a comment that the children's rooms are too small.
Yesterday, I visited a show home for a quote and took a look at the rooms there.
I have to admit, I was a bit shocked by the size of the children's rooms, which were about 11 sqm (118 sq ft). So, hardly smaller than what we have planned. Itâs hard to imagine the room size just from the paper.
Do you have any ideas on how to enlarge the three children's rooms on the upper floor without completely changing the entire floor plan?
Or if you have any other criticism or suggestions for improvement, feel free to share.
Best regards,
Steffen
The bulky design is intentional. There are much larger block-like buildings in the development, so ours is actually quite modest in comparison.
The double sink will be removed since only one is actually used.
The problem is that we generally like the floor plan except for the childrenâs rooms. Although my brother had an even smaller room, which I always found very cozy.
Maybe the model homeâs room seemed small just because it was empty. In our rental apartment, I also initially thought the 10 sqm (108 sq ft) office was too small until the furniture was removed.
Of course, having such a large bedroom is a bit extravagant, but right now 22 sqm (237 sq ft) is not enough. Because clothes currently hang not only in the wardrobe but also on two clothing racks.
Over time, you accumulate quite a lot.
And then thereâs the cross trainer that needs to be stored somewhere...
The double sink will be removed since only one is actually used.
The problem is that we generally like the floor plan except for the childrenâs rooms. Although my brother had an even smaller room, which I always found very cozy.
Maybe the model homeâs room seemed small just because it was empty. In our rental apartment, I also initially thought the 10 sqm (108 sq ft) office was too small until the furniture was removed.
Of course, having such a large bedroom is a bit extravagant, but right now 22 sqm (237 sq ft) is not enough. Because clothes currently hang not only in the wardrobe but also on two clothing racks.
Over time, you accumulate quite a lot.
And then thereâs the cross trainer that needs to be stored somewhere...
Visually, your house looks like an office building in an industrial area. Personally, I find this Bauhaus style more appealing when it is designed with a more "interlocking" layout. A straight staircase (perhaps with a glass balustrade) would suit this style better. I would also recommend redesigning it (as suggested). The hallway upstairs is large but very dark, and the children are unlikely to play there. In the children's bathroom, you donât really need two sinks since children donât use the bathroom at the same time. If the sofa stays where it is, youâll never have peace while sitting there. Anyone going into the kitchen (and with three children thereâs practically always someone passing by) will walk right behind you. At least, you could add a door from the hallway into the kitchen.
Best regards
Sabine
Best regards
Sabine
Curly schrieb:
Visually, your house looks like an office building in an industrial area. Personally, I find this Bauhaus style more appealing when it is designed with some complexity and variation.Sure, that would be better. But every bit of complexity adds extra costs and certainly doesnât improve the living quality.
I want a house that is functional; whether it looks nice or not doesnât matter to me in this case. Of course, it would be flattering if passersby turned green with envy when they walk by. But I can easily do without that as long as I feel comfortable inside.
I think this is exactly the problem with architects these days. They design a beautiful house that looks great from the outside. But inside, it lacks living quality. Ideally, they add a gallery so that noise from the living room carries directly into the bedroom with hardly any soundproofing.
arnonyme schrieb:
Obviously, such a large bedroom is a bit indulgent, but right now 22 sqm (237 sq ft) isnât enough for us. Because the clothes currently hang not only in the wardrobe but also on two clothes racks.
Over time, quite a lot accumulates.
Then thereâs also the cross trainer that needs to go somewhere...You also have to learn to let go of things.You have a total floor area with the basement of about 350 sqm (3,767 sq ft)... and you have a basement where you can put items that you might currently be storing in the bedroom. If thatâs not the plan, then why have such a huge basement at all?
And the âplay corridorâ: as @Curly already mentioned, it will probably be used very little for that, since you always have to put everything away. In general, the basement is better suited for that purpose.
RobsonMKK schrieb:
You also have to learn to let go of things.
You have a basement with a floor area of about 350 sqm (3,767 sq ft)... and you have a basement where you can store things that you might currently be keeping in the bedroom. If that isnât the plan, then why have such a large basement?It is "only" 300 sqm (3,229 sq ft) of floor area.
I need at least 5 m by 6 m (16 ft by 20 ft) floor space for my billiard room.
That would only be possible in the basement or on a third floor.
At most, some kind of extension or annex at the front of the house could still be considered. But whether that would be cost-effective compared to a basement is hard for me to judge, though I rather doubt it. Besides, then you would lose the storage rooms.
With so many clothes, decluttering helps. Capsule wardrobes are quite popular these days.
I really donât like the upper floor.
The parentsâ area is too large.
The childrenâs rooms are small compared to the overall living space.
There is a large, dark hallway that probably wonât be used as a play or common area. Especially, do you want that? In a few years, teenagers might be sitting outside your bedroom door at night, and youâll want to sleep undisturbed.
The staircase seems to me forgotten and somehow squeezed in.
On the ground floor, I would swap the kitchen and the workspace.
On days like today, it wonât be calm at all on your terrace, so can you still work effectively there?
I really donât like the upper floor.
The parentsâ area is too large.
The childrenâs rooms are small compared to the overall living space.
There is a large, dark hallway that probably wonât be used as a play or common area. Especially, do you want that? In a few years, teenagers might be sitting outside your bedroom door at night, and youâll want to sleep undisturbed.
The staircase seems to me forgotten and somehow squeezed in.
On the ground floor, I would swap the kitchen and the workspace.
On days like today, it wonât be calm at all on your terrace, so can you still work effectively there?
Similar topics