ᐅ First Draft Single-Family Home 150 m² with Basement

Created on: 26 Oct 2016 00:08
J
jaeger
First Draft Single-Family House 150m² (1,615 ft²) with Basement
Requesting general comments, improvement suggestions, ideas, upstairs bathroom, etc.

Development Plan / Restrictions
Plot size 850m² (20x43m) (22,990 ft² (66x141 ft))
No slope
Site coverage ratio 0.35
Floor area ratio 0.60
Building lines and boundaries 3m (10 ft) west and south, 6m (20 ft) east
Edge development yes except east side
Number of parking spaces 2
Number of stories maximum two full floors
Roof type gable roof 22-48°, shed roof 8-20°
Architectural style no restriction
Orientation not specified, ridge direction only recommended
Maximum heights/limits maximum permitted building height 9.5m (31 ft), knee walls maximum 1.0m (3 ft)
Other requirements at least 2 parking spaces per residential unit

Client Requirements
Style, roof type, building type simple, no bay windows, two full floors, low-pitched gable roof
Basement and floors basement, ground floor, upper floor
Number of occupants, age 29 and 30 (2 children planned after house completion)
Room requirements on ground and upper floor
Ground floor: living/dining, kitchen, pantry, bathroom;
Upper floor: 2 children's rooms, master bedroom, bathroom
Office: family use or home office? for business, possibly home office 1 day per week in future
Guests per year 4-5
Open or closed layout open living/dining, otherwise rather closed
Conservative or modern construction mixed
Open kitchen, cooking island no
Number of dining seats 6-8
Fireplace yes
Music/stereo wall no
Balcony, roof terrace no
Garage, carport double garage
Vegetable garden, greenhouse no preference
Other wishes / special features / daily routine no preference

House Design
Planner: planner from a construction company who is also an architect
What do you particularly like? entrance situation, room arrangement, layout and dimensions of upper floor (except upper floor bathroom)
What do you not like? too close to neighboring building on south plot, upper floor bathroom, entrance planned as flat roof, door location in living room, other minor details
Cost estimate from architect/planner: not yet available
Personal price limit for house including equipment: not entirely clear yet but around 400,000
Preferred heating system: either gas (without energy efficiency funding) or ground source heat pump via horizontal collector or borehole (energy standard KfW 55)

If you have to give up, which details/extensions
-can be omitted: high-end finishes, walk-in closet, ground source heat pump, turnkey delivery
-cannot be omitted: stove/fireplace, office, two walk-in showers, double garage

Because our plot is relatively long and narrow (20x43m (66x141 ft)), we have already given some thought to the possible arrangement of the house and garage. Here is the thread on that topic.

At first, we focused on the first variant with the garage located above the house to the north. However, with the garage and house together, it would have become very tight toward the south. The architect's first draft surprised us (garage on the east) but we generally liked it very much, so we are now presenting this as the basis here. Many of our wishes have already been met, and the draft is definitely a good starting point. I have to add that currently we do not have any eastern sun exposure and do not consider this a problem. The only drawback is that the house stands relatively centrally and garden space is “wasted,” partly due to the 6m (20 ft) setback on the east. But we will submit a preliminary building inquiry to possibly reduce the distance to 3m (10 ft).

So, here are the plans. North is at the top of the plan.


Two-dimensional house floor plan with hobby, office, and technical rooms, corridor and staircase

Floor plan of a house with living room, kitchen, entrance and garage.

2D floor plan of a house with corridor, staircase, master and children’s rooms

Bird’s-eye view site plan with building outlines and property boundaries

Cross-section through a multi-story house with roof, floors and foundation.

North view of a modern house with garage, entrance door and group of trees

East view of a house with garage and trees – simple line drawing

South view of a modern house facade with flat roof, large windows and trees.

West view of a two-story house with windows, door and trees beside the building
Y
ypg
29 May 2017 21:43
Tastes vary so much: I’m personally drawn to the north facade – I find it exciting and very lively 🙂

Regards, Yvonne
D
DonSchilli
29 May 2017 21:57
Hello

Just a quick note... I’m from the industry...

Question: Do you want to throw your money out the window? ^^

Go to a general contractor and have everything done there...
There are several advantages:

Planning security, no unnecessary costs for external parties,
In your example, at least a $50,000 saving^^

Many developers also offer multiple finishing levels and extras, so you don’t have to stress about it....

For the square meters, I would go for 2 full floors without knee walls and make the house narrower instead...
Advantage: cost savings, as the basement will then be smaller and cheaper...

For KfW standards, you don’t necessarily have to do core drilling... there are more efficient solutions that cost less...
For example, air source heat pumps and centralized ventilation... many builders also include these in their offerings...

Best regards
Y
ypg
29 May 2017 22:21
@DonSchilli
Someone who acts so aggressively and sends posts in copy does not appear trustworthy. Have you ever considered that inappropriate behavior can backfire???
D
DonSchilli
29 May 2017 23:02
Huh.... NO...

My question is

Why is he doing everything himself? Preliminary building application / planning permission, etc....
Why set a price limit but choose more expensive components for the KfW standard?
Why this orientation?
Why are the bathrooms not aligned vertically with the utility room?
What did the KfW calculation show?
These are some of my thoughts..
Otherwise, it’s difficult to discuss this... if you’re not in the architect’s mind.
11ant29 May 2017 23:14
jaeger schrieb:
Yes, that's right. As long as it’s not a structural issue, I don’t really mind. Do you see any major disadvantages because of that?

Major disadvantages? — more like ten extra minutes of work for the structural engineer, that’s all.

Interrupting the bonding of the wall because of the chimney is, in my opinion, a design flaw. As a proper perfectionist, I like to think I can tell which architect has actually done bricklaying themselves and which hasn’t. Allowing the wall to be properly tied together saves about an hour of work in the basement and an hour on the ground floor. Now that’s not a real tragedy. Thanks for the chance to claim once again that this wouldn’t have happened to me ;-)
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
D
DonSchilli
29 May 2017 23:19
So this won’t be a building permit/planning submission for the Green Dot (notification procedure) anyway^^ either way....