ᐅ Networking Technology in 2016 for a Single-Family Home

Created on: 15 Dec 2016 14:54
S
Sinus1986
Hello everyone,

I am currently planning the selection of network components for my future single-family home (approximately 200m² (2,150 sq ft)).

In this context, CAT7 cables will be installed in all rooms and centrally routed to the utility room, where they will be connected via a patch panel.

All in all, I will need a 48-port gigabit switch (preferably PoE or better PoE+).
The only question is: which model or brand, or from which manufacturer?

Do you have any experience? Can you recommend gigabit switches of this size?

Please no discussions about the size or design of the network switch.
I deliberately want to avoid local switches (for example, near the home theater wall) and connect all network cables to a corresponding wall outlet (my partner insists... theme "everything always has to look tidy" and so on...).

Thanks in advance for your input.

Best regards
N
nasenmann
16 Dec 2016 09:04
Sinus1986 schrieb:


--> I’ve often read that connecting switches in series can sometimes cause problems

No. How else would that be set up in a company network? Anyway, others have already given you some advice. Just get something affordable. You don’t need the expensive enterprise features.
S
Steffen80
16 Dec 2016 09:07
nasenmann schrieb:
No. How else would that be represented in a company network?
Anyway, others have already given you some tips. Choose something affordable. You don’t need the expensive enterprise features.

Hopefully, no cheap consumer-grade technology is used in a company. That’s how you get the network working properly.
S
Sinus1986
16 Dec 2016 09:25
Okay.. the only question left is about the manufacturer... Zyxel? Netgear? TP-Link? D-Link? Ubiquiti?

Where can I find the best price/performance options?
B
Bieber0815
16 Dec 2016 09:27
Sinus1986 schrieb:
if you could, would you want to connect all of them?

We have 24 network outlets, each with two ports, so 48 ports in total (plus space needed for the router/Fritzbox on the switch). In the medium term, I don’t need all 48 ports simultaneously. Some rooms currently don’t require a network connection (the kids are still offline, and the “who-knows-what-I-might-need-one-day” outlet in the attic is unused), and in other rooms I only use one of the two ports on the outlet. So it was clear that a “smaller” switch would easily suffice. I would have no concerns about setting up daisy-chaining later on.
sirhc16 Dec 2016 09:51
I just started counting.

First, I arrived at 7 rooms with a total of 8 duplex outlets = 16 ports. Then I remembered the duplex outlet for the telephone in the hallway and, since the router will be located in the basement in the utility room, there are also connections on the ground floor and first floor for one access point each. That already makes 20 ports, and the 24-port switch is almost fully occupied.

The simple solution like @Koempy used will probably be enough for me as well. I also see no problem with expanding in series later on.
Mycraft16 Dec 2016 10:19
@Sinus1986

Just check out the freely available tests online; there’s plenty of material. Choose a switch with the right price-to-performance ratio. As other users have mentioned, you won’t need the enterprise features.

For example, I use a simple 24-port switch from Allnet (because I wanted a fanless model) and an 8-port switch from Linksys for PoE… there are over 30 ports connected to the patch panels, but only about 20 are used simultaneously… both switches do exactly what they’re supposed to, and daisy-chaining in a single-family home does not cause any issues… as others have said, how else would it work in larger companies if not with partial daisy-chaining?