Hello,
we are considering installing wood-look tiles in our house (which is quite modern and open). I think these tiles, when well made, look really nice. I am just a bit skeptical whether I will still like them in a few years. Does anyone know a good manufacturer of wood-look tiles?
we are considering installing wood-look tiles in our house (which is quite modern and open). I think these tiles, when well made, look really nice. I am just a bit skeptical whether I will still like them in a few years. Does anyone know a good manufacturer of wood-look tiles?
P
Peanuts7419 Jan 2016 13:16"...That’s great for you if you like them!
But wood-look tiles, in sizes that, in my opinion, offer less design flexibility? I just want to understand how someone gets the idea to install wood in the form of tiles on their floors.
It’s simple if you want an easy-to-maintain, relatively durable floor covering that doesn’t swell immediately when something is spilled, doesn’t get scratched if you have a small stone under your shoe, and conducts the heat from underfloor heating very well.
By the way, we hardly tire of our wood-look tiles and find them increasingly attractive.
Our kitchen installer, who is a self-proclaimed “tile hater” and “hardwood flooring enthusiast,” had to look twice to confirm that they really were tiles (which I don’t quite understand)..."
But wood-look tiles, in sizes that, in my opinion, offer less design flexibility? I just want to understand how someone gets the idea to install wood in the form of tiles on their floors.
It’s simple if you want an easy-to-maintain, relatively durable floor covering that doesn’t swell immediately when something is spilled, doesn’t get scratched if you have a small stone under your shoe, and conducts the heat from underfloor heating very well.
By the way, we hardly tire of our wood-look tiles and find them increasingly attractive.
Our kitchen installer, who is a self-proclaimed “tile hater” and “hardwood flooring enthusiast,” had to look twice to confirm that they really were tiles (which I don’t quite understand)..."
P
Peanuts7419 Jan 2016 13:19Cascada schrieb:
...in new construction, with the low supply temperatures, the surface temperature will definitely be well below your body temperature -> the tiled floor will be perceived as "cool." For example, the maximum supply temperature during our coldest winter days is around 30°C (86°F).And as far as I know, the skin surface temperature is about 27 - 28°C (81 - 82°F) (which is why the waterbed is set to this temperature). So, we never have cold feet at approximately 30°C (86°F) supply temperature with 0°C (32°F) outside.
Peanuts74 schrieb:
And to my knowledge, the surface temperature of the skin is about 27 - 28 degrees Celsius (hence the waterbed is set to this temperature). So, we never have cold feet with a supply temperature of around 30 degrees Celsius (86°F) at 0°C (32°F) outside....but the 30 degrees Celsius (86°F) supply temperature (which I think is already quite high for a new building at 0°C (32°F) outdoor temperature) never actually reaches the surface of the floor covering.
P
Peanuts7419 Jan 2016 14:27That's right, according to the thermal imaging camera, the temperature was probably between 26 and 27°C (79 and 81°F)...
However, the feet never feel uncomfortably cold, except on the unheated stair steps leading down to the basement.
The 30°C (86°F) setting is mainly needed in the bathroom, since my wife prefers at least 24°C (75°F) in the living room. For me, it could be about 2 degrees cooler, then 27-28°C (81-82°F) would probably be enough. The house was built according to the 2009 Energy Saving Ordinance, so it’s practically already old.
However, the feet never feel uncomfortably cold, except on the unheated stair steps leading down to the basement.
The 30°C (86°F) setting is mainly needed in the bathroom, since my wife prefers at least 24°C (75°F) in the living room. For me, it could be about 2 degrees cooler, then 27-28°C (81-82°F) would probably be enough. The house was built according to the 2009 Energy Saving Ordinance, so it’s practically already old.
Peanuts74 schrieb:
True, according to the thermal imaging camera it was probably between 26 and 27°C (79 and 81°F)...
However, the feet never feel uncomfortably cold, except on the unheated basement stairs.
The 30°C (86°F) is mainly needed in the bathroom, since my wife prefers at least 24°C (75°F) in the living room. For me, it could be about 2 degrees cooler, then 27–28°C (81–82°F) would probably be enough. The house was built according to the 2009 Energy Saving Ordinance, so it’s basically already old. I believe that how "cold" something feels doesn’t depend solely on the temperature but also largely on thermal conductivity. That’s why a 20°C (68°F) carpet might feel much warmer than 27°C (81°F) tiles, because less heat is drawn away from the body or feet.
There’s also the subjective factor: what feels freezing cold to one person may feel warm to someone else.
Saruss schrieb:
There is also the element of subjectivity. What feels freezing cold to one person might already feel warm to someone else.Oh yes – while I prefer to move around the house in light clothing, my wife might bundle up very warmly.
Similar topics